During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
物價仍在上漲，但自從特朗普去年年初上任以來，通脹速度已經放緩。。业内人士推荐搜狗输入法2026作为进阶阅读
Performance tracking。业内人士推荐服务器推荐作为进阶阅读
6Koch borrowed the idea of using gelatine from mycologist Oscar Brefeld, who had used it to grow fungi. Interestingly, Brefeld also employed carrageenan, another seaweed-derived jelly. Because fungi generally favor growing at ambient temperatures, Brefeld might have been less plagued by the melting of growth media than Koch.