Imagine that you have a guitar string tuned to play a note called “middle C,” which has a frequency of 1 Hz. (In reality, middle C has a frequency of 261.626 Hz, so if you want to think in terms of actual frequencies, just multiply all the numbers in the following paragraphs by 261.626.)
These courts tend to frame the duty analysis in nakedly instrumental terms, as a matter of “whether the social benefits of imposing a duty outweigh the social costs of imposing a duty.”228 Defenders of the Palsgraf perspective are not amenable to this mode of analysis;229 after all, much of the early impetus for the Palsgraf perspective’s development was its aversion to collapsing duty analysis into a “blunderbuss” judicial weighing of social costs and benefits.230 Rather than reverse engineering conclusions about the duty of care by way of instrumental calculations about liability, defenders of the Palsgraf perspective believe that judges should closely examine the existing legal materials and the customary moral norms that they embody in order to discern whether those materials and norms are best understood to recognize that the defendant owes the plaintiff a duty.231 Conclusions about duty, so reached, should drive conclusions about liability rather than vice versa.
，这一点在新收录的资料中也有详细论述
Launching into the program proper brings me to the expected "I'm a spreadsheet!" grid layout, with column and row labels, arrow-key controllable cell cursor, and a blank area at the top for VisiCalc-y stuff. Let's go.。新收录的资料对此有专业解读
Последние новости